State v. DeVries’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Hudson v. Louisiana · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 119 Wash. 2d 167 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`it does not follow that such a witness may simply report such matters to the trier of fact: The Rule was not designed to enable a witness to summarize and reiterate all manner of inadmissible evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the evidence serves a legitimate purpose, is relevant to prove an element of the crime charged, and, on balance, the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cook“As long as any rational trier of fact could have found that he was armed, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, sufficient evidence exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.