Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 WASH2D 842 - State v. DeVries

State v. DeVries’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Hudson v. Louisiana · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 119 Wash. 2d 167 - State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`it does not follow that such a witness may simply report such matters to the trier of fact: The Rule was not designed to enable a witness to summarize and reiterate all manner of inadmissible evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the evidence serves a legitimate purpose, is relevant to prove an element of the crime charged, and, on balance, the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As long as any rational trier of fact could have found that he was armed, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, sufficient evidence exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.