State v. Snedden’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[ (1) ] intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, [and (2) ] the person enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling other than a vehicle.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Snedden · State v. Stinton

2. “in the burglary context where the victims allege affront or alarm. Id. Mr. Snedden was granted discretionary review. State v. Snedden, 148 Wash.2d 1008 , 62 P.3d 890 (2003). ISSUE Whether the crime of indecent exposure under RCW 9A.88.010 can serve as the predicate crime for second degree burglary under RCW 9A.52.030? ANALYSIS Second degree burglary requires, inter alia, that the perpetrator act”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Snedden

3. “Id. at 23. This cursory statement does not offer any insight on how Washington courts have used these classifications over time in developing their jurisprudence. Furthermore, contrary to Mr. Snedden's argument, Perkins indicates that the classifications evolved over time. For example, the common law crime of burglary did not use the classification phraseology”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Snedden