Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 WIS 330 - Williams v. Malm

Williams v. Malm’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
February 1975
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1975

10 state decisions

401912192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Will · Quale v. White · In re Gillmor's Will · Adams v. Rodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the common and usual practice for the scrivener to make the mark, the party merely touching the pen while it is being made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.