Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 Wis. 2d 314 - State v. Dums

149 Wis. 2d 314 - State v. Dums’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2020

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

10019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · 58 Wis. 2d 32 - State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La Plante · 81 Wis. 2d 491 - State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. Wilkie · United States v. Cowan · 85 Wis. 2d 36 - State v. Kenyon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] challenge [to] a criminal statute for vagueness requires that the statute prohibit specific conduct. Section 967.055(2) does not prohibit conduct, but instead regulates the court's procedure for determining whether the prosecutor's application to amend or dismiss the charge should be accepted. Therefore, we need not analyze the void for vagueness argument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “may approve the application only if [it] finds that the proposed amendment or dismissal is consistent with the public's interest in deterring the operation of motor vehicles by persons who are under the influence of an intoxicant....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is consistent with the public's interest in deterring the operation of motor vehicles by persons who are under the influence of an intoxicant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.