149 Wis. 2d 756 - Tasker Ex Rel. Carson v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably 167 Wis. 2d 287 - Garcia Ex Rel. Ladd v. Regent Insurance Co. (1992), 161 Wis. 2d 450 - Thompson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (1991)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 71 Wis. 2d 408 - Lawver v. Boling · 95 Wis. 2d 215 - Tomlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance · 142 Ga. App. 562 - Southeastern Fidelity Insurance v. Stevens · Travelers Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · 90 Mich. App. 307 - Shinabarger v. Citizens Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Leaving one’s child in a motor vehicle during a brief errand, ostensibly for safety as well as convenience, is reasonably consistent with the inherent nature of the vehicle. The fact that the activities that occurred here, i.e., the child’s sudden exit onto the highway, could have occurred and the accident taken place without the use of the vehicle is irrelevant. We conclude that the activities giving rise to the injuries here were within the reasonable contemplation of the parties to the [insurance policy].” Tasker, 149 Wis. 2d at 761 , 439 N.W.2d at 161 .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“away from the vehicle, which use was consistent with the inherent nature of the vehicle, and not foreign to its purpose. Indisputably, Yndestad was not even using the passenger compartment, the only part of a vehicle where a person's presence might raise a presumption of”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the use of the vehicle. [Tasker v. Larson, 149 Wis. 2d 756, 761 , 439 N.W.2d 159 , (Ct. App. 1989)] (quoting Shinabarger v. Citizens Mut. Ins. Co., 282 N.W.2d 301, 305 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)). Thus,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.