Grayson v. AT & T CORP.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
11 district · 48 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Baker v. Carr · Allen v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven though Congress created the District of Columbia court system under Article I of the Constitution, rather than Article III, this court has followed consistently the constitutional standing requirement embodied in Article III.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a violation of this chapter for any person to engage in an unfair or deceptive trade practice, whether or not any consumer is in fact misled, deceived, or damaged thereby, including to misrepresent as to a material fact which has a tendency to mislead.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]t has long been accepted that the judiciary may make appropriate inquiry beyond the pleadings to satisfy itself on authority to entertain the case.”) (quoting Haase, 835 F.2d at 906 ). 18 . Heard v. Johnson, 810 A.2d 871, 877-78 (D.C.2002). 19 . Matthews v. Automated Bus. Sys. & Servs., Inc., 558 A.2d 1175, 1179 (D.C.1989). See Grayson, 15 A.3d at 232 (observing that “it is within the trial court’s power to allow or to require the plaintiff to supply, by amendment to the complaint or by affidavits, further particularized allegations of fact deemed supportive of plaintiff’s standing”) (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 501 , 95 S.Ct. 2197 and citing Haase, 835 F.2d at 906 ). We explained in Matthews that, unlike in the 12(b)(6) context, "[t]he submission of affidavits ... does not convert a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to one for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.