Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 Ala. App. 133 - Roden v. State

15 Ala. App. 133 - Roden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 1947
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1947

7 state decisions

401916192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. State · Cox v. State · Harper v. State · City of Tuscaloosa v. Hill · Jones v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence, and on appeal the presumption will be indulged in favor of the ruling of the trial court that evidence was offered making material the testimony offered by the state to show that no powder burns were found on the clothes of the deceased when examined the next morning after the killing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.