Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 Ala. App. 67 - King v. State

15 Ala. App. 67 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 1952
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1952

14 state decisions

6019161920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickory v. United States · Moon's Adm'r v. Crowder · Commonwealth v. Mason · Snider v. Burks · Holbrook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by placing a writing not in evidence in the case in juxtaposition with the one in dispute for the purpose of allowing a witness or the jury to inspect the two in determining whether or not they were written by the same person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it was not permissible to prove a disputed handwriting by comparison or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.