Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 Backes 26 - Santamaria v. Shell Eastern Petro.

Santamaria v. Shell Eastern Petro.’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2016

1 district · 12 state decisions

60193419401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shenandoah Valley R. R. v. Dunlop · Riehl v. Riehl · Administrators of Ligon v. Rogers · Swedesboro Loan & Building Ass'n v. Gans · Giammares v. Allemannia Fire Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mistake exists when a person, under some erroneous conviction of law or fact, does, or omits to do, some act which but for the erroneous conviction he would not have done or omitted. Cummins v. Bulgin, 37 N.J. Eq. 476 . It may arise either from unconsciousness, ignorance, forgetfulness, imposition or misplaced confidence. Where it arises from imposition or misplaced confidence, relief may be had on the ground of fraud. Where it arises from unconsciousness, ignorance or forgetfulness, no fraud exists and redress must be on the basis of mistake.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Reformation will not be granted unless there is clear error. Vice-Chancellor Grey in Anderson v. Anderson Food Co., 66 N.J. Eq. 209 , said: `Courts of equity do not grant the high remedy of reformation upon a probability, or even upon a mere preponderance of evidence, but only upon a certainty of error.' The same rule was enunciated in Giammares v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co., 91 N.J. Eq. 114 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.