Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 CAL 334 - Palmer v. McCafferty

Palmer v. McCafferty’s Empirical Analysis

1860

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 1936
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1936

3 state decisions

1018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All that the Court can ask is, that the particular evidence offered conduces to establish any one proposition involved in the issue. . . . There must be a starting place somewhere, and the Court should never reject evidence, merely because, unaided by other testimony, it is insufficient, if it tend legally to prove any part of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.