15 Cal. 3d 528 - Wong v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 11 Cal. 3d 210 - Emslie v. State Bar · 64 Cal. 2d 787 - Zitny v. State Bar of California · 9 Cal. 3d 356 - Patty v. Board of Medical Examiners · 57 Cal. 2d 633 - Best v. State Bar · 10 Cal. 3d 156 - Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A state bar disciplinary proceeding may be maintained even though the accused attorney has been acquitted on criminal charges covering the same facts or has obtained a dismissal of such charges." Wong v. State Bar (Cal. 1975), 15 Cal.3d 528 , 125 Cal. Rptr. 482 , 542 P.2d 642 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of Goldman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.