15 Cal. 3d 921 - In Re Podesto’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

167

cited by 167 later decisions

states following

September 2018

most recently cited

167 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 42 Cal. 3d 891 - People v. Overstreet (1986), 28 Cal. 3d 1 - Hovey v. Superior Court (1980)

167 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)

Relies on Stovall v. Denno · Kent v. United States · 13 Cal. 3d 804 - Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co. · 44 Cal. 2d 434 - People v. Cahan · 6 Cal. 3d 628 - People v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“confidence in the decision-making process `by helping to persuade the parties [and the public] that ... decision-making is careful, reasoned and equitable.' [Citation.]”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 21 Cal. 3d 18 - Cabell v. John H. · 33 Cal. 3d 189 - In Re Pipinos
““(1) the defendant’s ties to the community, including his employment, the duration of his residence, his family attachments and his property holdings; “(2) the defendant’s record of appearance at past court hearings or of flight to avoid prosecution.” In re Podesto, 15 Cal.3d 921 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 97 , 544 P.2d 1297, 1305 (Cal.1976).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Kerrigan · 33 Cal. 3d 189 - In Re Pipinos
“include a brief statement of reasons in support of an order granting or denying a motion for bail on appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. In re Humphrey · 94 Cal. App. 4th 1358 - People v. Seneca Ins. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.