Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 Cal. App. 4th 1611 - Shields v. Singleton

15 Cal. App. 4th 1611 - Shields v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 72 Cal. App. 4th 214 - Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior Court (1999), 72 Cal. App. 4th 111 - Nelson v. Anderson (1999)

6 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

220199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 11 Cal. 3d 574 - Hurtado v. Superior Court · Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corp. · Allison Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp. · Findley v. Garrett · Anders v. General Motors Corp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he general allegations which plaintiff here indiscriminately levels against all the directors of the Company are insufficient to establish that demand on the board would have been futile. As the court below noted, in order to evaluate the demand futility claim, the court must be apprised of facts specific to each director from which it can conclude that that particular director could or could not be expected to fairly evaluate the claims of the shareholder plaintiff. ‘The task of demanding action ... is not on erous. No policy recommends eviscerating the demand requirement as plaintiff would have us do.’ (Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corp. (9th Cir.1980) 634 F.2d 1204, 1210 ).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.