Mantell v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eisenstadt v. Baker · Alder v. United States · Cherek v. United States · Adams v. Fulcomer · Bundrick v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Great latitude is normally given to a litigant who . . . represents himself in legal proceedings . . . Such a litigant shall have the opportunity to have his case fully and fairly heard so far as such latitude is consistent with the just rights of any adverse party . . . Even pro se litigants, however, [are] `. . . bound by the same rules of . . . procedure as those qualified to practice law'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.