Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 CONNAPP 96 - Durham v. Miceli

Durham v. Miceli’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2024

15 state decisions

9019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Davis · Mazzei v. Cantales · Schibi v. Schibi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n annulment renders the marriage void ab initio while a dissolution is based upon a valid marriage which terminates as of the date of the judgment of dissolution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.