Vianello v. The Credit Lyonnais’s Empirical Analysis
15 F. 637 · 1883
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1957
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“i “Whenever a cross-libel is filed upon any counterclaim arising out of the same cause of action for which ihe original libel was filed, the'respondents in the cross-libel shall give security in the usual amount and form, to respond in damages as claimed in .said cross-libel, unless the court on cause shown, shall otherwise direct; and all proceedings upon the original libel shall bo stayed until such security shall be given.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““I am satisfied that the words the ‘same cause of action’ are here used in a more general sense, meaning the same transaction, dispute, or subject-matter which has been the cause of the action being brought.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.