Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.1d 804 - Coburn v. Clark

Coburn v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

15 F. 804 · 1883

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 1912
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1912

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601883189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bantz v. Frantz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Preliminary injunctions are not to be granted, it may be destructively, to defendants merely because an indefinite decision lias been made by some court whose views are not disclosed in its decree; and, on the other hand, when plaintiff’s rights have been fairly determined, should piracy be tolerated pendente lite'?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.