Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 F.2d 1015

Docket No. 3511.

McDowell v. Heiner

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1926.)

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1926-12-07

3 counsel of record

Relies on McDowell v. Heiner

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1926-12-07

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; W. H. Seward Thomson, Judge.

¶2William G. Heiner, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

¶3Charles T. Hendler, of Washington, D. C., John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and A. W. Gregg and Chester A. Gwinn, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶4Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Palls, Tex., amicus curiae.

¶5Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7The opinion of the court below, reported at 9 F.(2d) 120, is so full and satisfactory that a further one by this court cannot perforce be but an attempt to restate what that court satisfactorily said. We therefore restrict ourselves to adopting its opinion and affirming its decree, dismissing plaintiff’s biR.

/15/f2d/1015 · .json · Public domain