Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.2d 171 - Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Ware

Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

15 F.2d 171 · 1926

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019 · most notably Burford v. Sun Oil Co. (1943), Franzen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (1944)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

901926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cox · Dennick v. Railroad Co. · Davis v. Gray · Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Wallace · Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But venue is no part of the right; and a state cannot create a transitory cause of action and at the same time destroy the right to sue on that transitory cause of action in any court having jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.