The Cornelia’s Empirical Analysis
15 F.2d 245 · 1926
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1956
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Georgia Florida Alabama Railway Company v. Blish Milling Company · The Caledonia · The Southwark · International Navigation Company v. Farr Bailey Manufacturing Company · The Edwin Morrison Bradley Fertilizer Co v. Lavender
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But here the parties agreed that their contract should be governed by all the provisions and exemptions of that act. Necessarily exemptions contained in‘the contract and in the bills of lading, the provisions of which were embodied in the contract, are, as the parties agreed they should be, subject to the provisions of the Harter Act, not because the agreement of carriage is a shipping document within the meaning of that'statute, but because the parties themselves agreed that the statute should apply to their contract of carriage.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Agwimoon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.