Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.2d 931 - Mintie v. Biddle

Mintie v. Biddle’s Empirical Analysis

15 F.2d 931 · 1926

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2002

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

70192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte United States · Ex parte Siebold · People ex rel. Smith v. Allen · Commonwealth v. Maloney · People ex rel. Boenert v. Barrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If court’s jurisdiction to impose sentence is lost because of indefinite postponement without any order of continuance for some four terms, question of prisoner’s consent thereto is immaterial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.