Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.2d 974 - Proctor v. Painter

Proctor v. Painter’s Empirical Analysis

15 F.2d 974 · 1926

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2016

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

301926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St.louis Smelting and Refining Company v. Kemp. · Burke v. Southern Pacific Railroad · The Fisheries Products Company, Receivers of the Fisheries Products Company v. Abraham S. See & Depew, Inc. · Burfenning v. Chicago St P M O Ry Co · Morton v. Nebraska

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.