Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.3d 115 - Hulsey v. Sargent

Hulsey v. Sargent’s Empirical Analysis

15 F.3d 115 · 1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Mills v. Maryland · Smith v. Barry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the allowance of piecemeal litigation cannot possibly serve the interests of society, the defendant or the crime victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.