United States v. Duran’s Empirical Analysis
15 F.3d 131 · 1994
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Karterman (1995), United States v. Buck (2003)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on Stinson v. United States · United States v. Brady · United States v. Zweber · United States v. Fine · United States v. Hahn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In applying the abuse of trust adjustment, sentencing courts may now consider relevant conduct other than that involved in the offense of conviction.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“offenses of a character for which Sec. 3D1.2(d) would require grouping, all such acts and omissions that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defendant abused a position of public or private trust ... in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.