Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mijalis’s Empirical Analysis
15 F.3d 1314 · 1994
Citation profile
105 federal appellate · 15 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 232 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Mooney v. Aramco Services Co. (1995), United States v. Scroggins (2010)
105 federal appellate · 15 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 12 U.S.C. § 1828 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Relies on United States v. Gaubert · Mmahat v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. · Rufo v. Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail · Dade v. Cannatella · Clark v. Roemer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 232 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial and ineradicable doubt whether the jury has been properly guided in its deliberations.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Young v. Bd. of Supervisors of Humphreys Cnty. · Peter J. Dahlen, Peter J. Dahlen, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gulf Crews, Inc. Gulf Boat Marine Services, Inc. Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees, Universal Ogden Services, Forest Oil Corp., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Security Insurance Company of Hartford, Third Party“[I]f a litigant desires to preserve an argument for appeal, the litigant must press and not merely intimate the argument during the proceedings before the district court. If an argument is not raised to such a degree that the district court has an opportunity to rule on it, we will not address it on appeal.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we will not reverse if we determine, based upon the entire record, that the challenged instruction could not have affected the outcome of the case.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Young v. Bd. of Supervisors of Humphreys Cnty. · Peter J. Dahlen, Peter J. Dahlen, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gulf Crews, Inc. Gulf Boat Marine Services, Inc. Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees, Universal Ogden Services, Forest Oil Corp., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Security Insurance Company of Hartford, Third Party
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.