Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.3d 1338 - Cinel v. Connick

Cinel v. Connick’s Empirical Analysis

15 F.3d 1338 · 1994

Citation profile

539
cited by 539 later decisions
5
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

148 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 539 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Ramming v. United States (2001), Pani v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield (1998)

148 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions

21401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Paul v. Davis · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 539 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellant abandons all issues not raised and argued in its initial brief on appeal.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “accepting all well-pleaded facts as true and viewing those facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A party who inadequately briefs an issue is considered to have abandoned the claim.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.