United States v. Owen’s Empirical Analysis
15 F.3d 1528 · 1994
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2017
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Cheek v. United States · In re Martin-Trigona · United States v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) tends to establish intent, knowledge, motive, identity, or absence of mistake or accident; (2) is so related to the charged offense that it serves to establish intent, knowledge, motive, identity, or absence of mistake or accident;, (3) has real probative value and not just possible worth; (4) is close in time to the crime charged; and (5) even if relevant, be excluded if the probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the evidence must be offered for a proper purpose; (2) the evidence must be relevant; (3) the trial court must make a Rule 403 determination of whether the probative value of the similar acts is substantially outweighed by its potential for unfair prejudice; and (4) pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 105, the trial court shall, upon request, instruct the jury that evidence of similar acts is to be considered only for the proper purpose for which it was admitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The defendant made and subscribed to a tax return; (2) The return contained a written declaration that it was made under penalties of perjury; (3) The defendant did not believe the return to be true and correct as to every material matter; and (4) The defendant acted willfully.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.