Weber v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
15 F.3d 691 · 1994
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Stone v. Powell · Nix v. Williams · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly inform[ ] the state court of the factual basis for ... [his] claim and ... argue[ ] that those facts constitute a violation of ... [his] fourth amendment rights.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We conclude that under Stone a federal habeas court considering a state prisoner's claim alleging a Fourth Amendment violation should abstain from reviewing the state court records to determine if the state court's factual findings are fairly supported by the record as a whole....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miranda v. Leibach“factual findings are not fairly supported by the record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.