United States v. Ramacci’s Empirical Analysis
15 F.3d 75 · 1994
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably United States v. Messino (1995), United States v. Webster (1997)
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. Herrera · Respito v. Derwinski · United States v. Brown · United States v. Lamere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“absent Mr. Ramacci, Torres and Baker would not have become involved in the counterfeiting scheme”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“falsely made or manufactured in its entirety.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“due deference to the district court's application of the guidelines to the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.