Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 F.3d 82 - Robinson v. Turner

Robinson v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

15 F.3d 82 · 1994

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2016

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

110199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2072

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Scott v. E O'Grady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, whether prison mail room employees are authorized to accept service for another prison employee; and second, if these employees are authorized to accept service, whether, in the context of the prison environment, receipt by another can be said to be adequate notice [pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 4.15(F) and the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Service may be made upon an individual ... by: (1) sending a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail or other public means by which a written acknowledgement of receipt may be requested and obtained to his residence, place of business or employment with return receipt requested and returned showing receipt of the letter;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) promptly deliver the papers to that person; (2) promptly notify that person that he holds the papers for him; or (3) within a reasonable time, in writing, notify the clerk or person making the service that he has been unable to make such delivery of notice when such is the ease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.