Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 F. App'x 172

Farley v. Martin

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-08-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2017

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1David P. Farley appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his suit as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farley v. Martin, No. CA-01-218-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/15/fappx/172 · .json · Public domain