¶1Respondent Maryellen Thoms appeals a district court order granting a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by this federal prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner Smith moves for counsel and for pauper status. This case was held in abeyance pending a decision in the Supreme Court’s case of Lopez v. Davis, No. 99-7504, and this court’s case of Powell v. Thoms, No. 99-5974. These cases have now been decided. See Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 121 S.Ct. 714, 718, 148 L.Ed.2d 635 (2001); Powell v. Thoms, No. 99-5974 (6th Cir. Apr. 5, 2001) (unpublished order). Upon consideration, we conclude that the district court is in a better position to resolve the impact of the Lopezdecision upon this case than we are. See Hardy v. Sec’y for Dep’t of Corrs., 246 F.3d 1300, 1301 (11th Cir.2001) (per curiam). Therefore, it is sua sponte ordered that the judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez. The motions for counsel and pauper status are denied.
15 F. App'x 243
Smith v. Thoms
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided July 18, 2001
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-07-18
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Lopez v. Davis · Hardy v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
Decided 2001-07-18