Young v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 1983 · most notably 144 Ga. App. 673 - Deavers v. Standridge (1978), Lott v. Banks (1917)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co. · Maxwell v. Harrison · Jordan v. Downs · Martin v. Carter · Ross v. McDuffie & Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would not be such a departure from the terms of the contract as to necessitate notice from the vendor to the vendee, of the intention of the former to rely upon the exact terms of the original contract relating to payments.” Young v. Durham, 15 Ga. App. 678 (2) ( 84 S. E. 165 ). There is no merit in this ground.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. Irwin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.