Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 Ill. 2d 607 - Prince v. Industrial Commission

15 Ill. 2d 607 - Prince v. Industrial Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2021

24 state decisions

9019591960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Claim of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Corp. · Cinmino's Case · Chicago Hardware Foundry Co. v. Industrial Commission · 1 Ill. 2d 99 - Hunter Packing Co. v. Industrial Commission · Wilhelm v. Industrial Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether an injury due to an idiopathic fall on a level floor may be said, as a matter of law, to have arisen out of the employment is a question of first impression in this State. There is a sharp division of opinion among those jurisdictions that have had occasion to consider the question. See cases cited in 99 C.J.S. Workmen’s Compensation § 257(1). Counsel for plaintiff in error and for defendant in error have been most helpful with their discussion and analysis of the cases from foreign jurisdictions. We have considered them carefully and are in accord with those holding that concrete floors present no risk or hazard that is not encountered in many places, and that such risks and perils as they do present are only those which confront all members of the public. See, e. g., Cinmino’s Case, 251 Mass. 158 , 146 N.E. 245 , 37 A.L.R. 769 ; Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Corp., 253 N.Y. 97 , 170 N.E. 506 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “present no risk or hazard that is not encountered in many places”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.