Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 Ind. 23

Searl v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1860

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1860-11-26

<p>A pleading stricken out on motion is not in the record, unless put in by-hill of exceptions.</p>

Relies on Saunders v. Heaton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1860-11-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1914

4 state decisions

20186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1In this case, the hill of exceptions says that certain evidence was all the evidence; hut it shows on its face that it doesAot contain it all. Items of evidence given are not copied into the bill.

¶2"A pleading stricken out on motion is not in the record, unless put in by bill of exceptions. Saunders v. Heaton et al., 12 Ind. 20.

¶3The judgment is affirmed, with 5 iier cen^‘ damages and costs.

/15/ind/23 · .json · Public domain