LAWRENCE’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Karnuth v. United States ex rel. Albro · HIRA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It appears that the . . . respondent might easily decide to remain here permanently to supervise the day-to- day operations of [the company], even though he may choose to return to Canada on a regular basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“qualify as a business visitor if his business activities almost exclusively involved the fulltime management of a United States enterprise,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“certainly does not contemplate a potentially limitless visit to the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.