Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 KAN 602 - Headley v. Challiss

Headley v. Challiss’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2024

23 state decisions

501875188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington Bridge Company v. William Stewart · de McKinlay v. Tuttle · Phelan v. City & County of San Franciso · Hosack's Executors v. Rogers · Yates v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A party may not settle the law of his case by piecemeal before this court, any more than he may settle the facts in that way before the district court. When the case is tried, he must be prepared to present his entire claim, or his entire defense.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““This is a proceeding in error to review the decision of the district court overruling a motion to set aside a judgment. The judgment was rendered in an action to foreclose a mortgage, and upon service only by publication. . . . (Challiss v. Headley, 9 Kan. 684 .) Upon abundant authority, and weE-settled principles, the decision at that time has become the established law of the case.’ [Citations omitted.] Whatever therefore, was at that time decided, is not now a matter for reexamination.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Whatever therefore, was at that time decided, is not now a matter for reexamination. Nor is this limited to the mere questions noticed in the opinion, nor indeed to the actual matters presented by the respective counsel, and considered by the court. ... A party may not settle the law of his case by piecemeal before this court, any more rthan he may settle the facts in that way before the district court.” (Headley v. Challiss, 15 Kan. 602, 606, 607.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.