15 Kan. App. 2d 68 - State v. Leroy’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Schmerber v. State of California · Pennsylvania v. Muniz · In re Jantz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the landmark ease of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 , 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966), the United States Supreme Court held the prosecution cannot use statements, whether inculpatory or exculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation, unless it proves that procedural safeguards were used to secure defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination. These safeguards included informing the person in custody, prior to interrogation, of his Fifth Amendment rights to remain silent, to consult with an attorney, and to have an attorney present during interrogation. 384 U.S. at 445 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.