Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 Mass. 243

Whitney v. Peckham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1818

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1818-09-15

<p>In an action for a malicious prosecution for an offence, a conviction of the plaintiff, of such offence, before a justice of the peace having jurisdiction, is conclu sive evidence of probable cause; although, upon appeal from the justice, the plaintiff was acquitted.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1818-09-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 1937 · most notably Crescent City Live-Stock Landing Slaughter-House Co v. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House Live-Stock Landing Co (1887), Burt v. . Smith (1905)

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions — followed in 17 states

701818182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Case for a malicious prosecution, before a justice of the peace, for • an alleged assault and battery. Trial on the general issue before Putnam, J. The plaintiff offered in evidence a copy of the record and proceedings before the justice, by which it appeared that Whitney pleaded not guilty to the complaint of Peckham; that the justice found him guilty, and sentenced him to pay a fine of two dollars and costs. Whitney appealed from this sentence to the Circuit Court of Common Pleas, where he was acquitted.

¶2The judge, being of opinion that the conviction before the justice, he having jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the complaint, was conclusive evidence that there was probable cause, directed a non-suit ; and the point being reserved for the opinion of the whole *225Court, the nonsuit was confirmed, and the defendant had judgment for his costs. (1) (a)

¶3Lincoln for the plaintiff.

¶4Mills and L. Bigelow for the defendant.

¶5See 1 Wils. 232, Reynolds vs. Kennedy. (a) Vide Cotton, vs. James, l B. & Ad. 12d. — Pierce vs. Thomson, 6 Pick. 193.

/15/mass/243 · .json · Public domain