Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 Mich. 113

Raymond v. Hinkson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1866

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1866-11-10

The bill in this cause was filed by an execution creditor, who had purchased lands at sheriff’s %ale, to avoid a deed alleged to have been executed to defraud creditors. A decree was rendered in favor of complainant. The facts are stated in the opinion. The want of the ad damnum clause, in the declaration, did not affect the validity of the judgment, as, if it was a defect, it is cured by judgment under the statute of Jeofails.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1881

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1866-11-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Campbell J.

¶1The bill in this cause was filed by an execution creditor, who had purchased lands at sheriff’s sale, to avoid a deed alleged to have been executed to defraud creditors.

¶2The suit on which execution issued was commenced by attachment. The declaration set forth no cause of action but a justice’s judgment, and did not contain any common counts nor any ad damnwm clause. The defendant, Samuel Hinkson, was personally served with the writ, but did not appear. The judgment sued on, with interest, was less than one hundred dollars, as set forth in the declaration, at the time of commencing suit.

¶3The Constitution gives to Justices of the Peace exclusive jurisdiction in suits ex contractu up to one hundred dollars! As the cause of action, and the amount claimed must be set up in the declaration, it -follows, as a matter of course, that when that shows less than one hundred dollars to be claimed, it shows that the Circuit Court has no jurisdiction. No presumption can be raised in favor of a plaintiff against his own express allegations.

¶4It follows that the judgment rendered upon this declaration was void, as the court had no jurisdiction over the cause. The other questions become of no importance. The decree below must be reversed, and the bill must be dismissed, with the costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.
/15/mich/113 · .json · Public domain