Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 MINN 26 - Brooks v. Hamilton

Brooks v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1870

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
December 1931
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1931

12 state decisions

501870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ To constitute a fraudulent representation, the party making the representation must represent that as true of his own knowledge which is not true, but as to tlio truth or falsity of which -he has no knowledge, or must represent that as true which is false, and the truth or falsity of which he is presumed to know.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.