Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 N.J. Super. 417 - State v. Ballard

15 N.J. Super. 417 - State v. Ballard’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2015

24 state decisions

1501951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · McNally v. Hill · Walker v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although there is admittedly no fixed time limit within which the writ of habeas corpus may be sought, there are decisions in which courts have expressed the view that the issuance of the writ may, under proper circumstances, be denied because of the delay in seeking it. See In re Tremper, supra ; In re Zee, supra [ 13 N.J. Super. 312 ( Cty. Ct. 1951)]; 39 C.J.S. 619 (1944). But cf. In re Gladstone, supra [ 12 N.J. Super. 589 ( Cty. Ct. 1951)]; People ex rel. Albanese v. Hunt, 177 Misc. 151 , 30 N.Y.S. 2 d 137 ( Sup. Ct. 1941), reversed on other ground in 266 App. Div. 105 , 41 N.Y.S. 2 d 646 (1943).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although our decisions state that the writ of habeas corpus is issuable in the discretion of the court ( In re Van Winkle, 3 N.J. 348, 355 (1950)), they recognize that when proper cause is shown, the issuance of the writ is a matter of right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.