15 N.J. Super. 534 - Faunce v. Boost Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
3 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2007
3 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Black v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Co. · 98 N.J. Eq. 326 - General Investment Co. v. American Hide & Leather Co. · Zabriskie v. Hackensack and N.Y. R.R. Co. · Frelinghuysen v. Town of Morristown · Cone v. Russell & Mason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an incident to membership or of the property in the stock, of which the stockholder or member cannot be deprived without his consent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'very compelling circumstances,' 'where the interests of justice, morality and common fairness clearly dictate' " that IBSF not be permitted to bar the Committee's nominations. 50 Moreover, the district court's determination that IBSF would not be prejudiced by a requirement that it accept the Committee's nominees, while perhaps correct as a factual matter, is irrelevant as a legal matter. The Certificate of Incorporation gives the board the discretion to reject nominations if the nominees do not provide specified information, after notice, within the time given to cure. "The certificate of incorporation ... constitute[s] a contract between the corporation and its stockholders and the stockholders inter sese.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.