People v. Witenski’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2013 · most notably Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera (1966), Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATT (1971)
3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Rideau v. Louisiana · People v. . Molineux · Matter of Bojinoff v. People · People v. McLaughlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““You are entitled to the aid of counsel in every stage of these proceedings, and before any further proceedings are had. You are entitled to an adjournment for that purpose and upon your request I will send a message to any counsel you name within this jurisdiction. Do you desire counsel?” [The answer was “no.”]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“would be hard put to find and assign lawyers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.