Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 N.Y.2d 823

Halpern v. Jad Construction Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1965

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1965-02-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1974

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-02-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order affirmed without costs. The complaint states no cause of action, either in negligence or breach of warranty, against defendant Firestone. However, in reaching this conclusion, we find it unnecessary to consider the question—and we reserve it for a proper case—whether an action for breach of an implied warranty may ever be brought against the manufacturer of a component part such as an automobile tire. (Cf. Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp., 12 N Y 2d 432, 437.)

¶2Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

/15/ny2d/823 · .json · Public domain