¶1Motion by appellants Levy and D ’Antonio to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendants argued that they were deprived of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment when the People called a witness (Daniel Cohen) to the stand to testify knowing that he would claim privilege against self incrimination and then read to the jury his alleged confession. The Court of Appeals held that there was no violation of defendants’ constitutional rights. [See 15 N Y 2d 159.]
15 N.Y.2d 910
People v. Levy
Decided March 11, 1965
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1965-03-11
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1965-03-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1980
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →