Grimm v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, an increase in the rent alone will not be sufficient to establish a 'colorable claim of fraud,' and a mere allegation of fraud alone, without more, will not be sufficient ... What is required is evidence of a landlord's fraudulent deregulation scheme to remove an apartment from the protections of rent stabilization.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[W]here the overcharge complaint alleges fraud [there is] an obligation to ascertain whether the rent on the base date is a lawful rent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the rental history of the housing accommodation prior to the four-year period preceding the filing of a complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.