15 Ohio App. 2d 215 - James v. Franks’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2015
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 136 Ohio St. 307 - Wery v. Seff · 31 Ohio App. 273 - Fightmaster v. Mode · 106 Ohio St. 481 - Harper v. State · 53 Ohio App. 341 - Michalsky v. Gaertner · Keveney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The degree of care cannot be reasonably expected of children that older and experienced persons habitually employ and therefore greater precaution should be taken when a person knows, or should, from the circumstances know, that children may reasonably be expected to be in the vicinity.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““A motorist who knows or should know from the circumstances that children may be reasonably expected to be in the vicinity must anticipate childish conduct.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.