Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 OHIOST3D 48 - Marshall v. Aaron

Marshall v. Aaron’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

162
cited by 162 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 148 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Bostic v. Connor (1988), Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc. (1992)

8 federal appellate · 148 state decisions

54019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. · 141 Ohio St. 373 - Gillum v. Industrial Commission · Capital Films Corporation v. Charles Fries Productions, Inc. And American Broadcasting Company · Denton v. Mr. Swiss of Missouri, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Civ.R. 56 does not authorize courts to enter summary judgment in favor of a non-moving party.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where all relevant evidence is before the court, no genuine issue as to any material fact exists, and the non-moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here no motion has been filed, and necessarily no evidence attached thereto, no conclusion, favorable or adverse, is properly available upon which to base an order for summary judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.