Holt v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 1935
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hastings Co v. Whitney · Witherspoon v. Duncan · Sturr v. Beck · Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Kunkel · Hodges v. Colcord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where fraud is relied upon as the basis for equitable relief, 'and the trial court, after hearing the evidence, finds that fraud has not been, established, the appellate court will not disturb such finding, unless it is clearly against the weight of evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schock v. Fish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.